View Table of Contents
Social Bonds as Freedom
Revisiting the Dichotomy of the Universal and the Particular
Edited by Paul Dumouchel and Reiko Gotoh
296 pages, 4 tables, bibliog., index
ISBN 978-1-78238-693-3 $95.00/£67.00 Hb Published (August 2015)
eISBN 978-1-78238-694-0 eBook
“This excellent set of essays offers a fantastic contribution to how we might consider the relation between the national and the global in modern political thought, written by many of the leading international figures in the field….A terrific resource for anyone interested in engaging more deeply with the ways we should conceive liberal democracy in light of globalization with far reaching implications for politics, philosophy and public policy.” · Thom Brooks, Durham University
“This book contains the best and the most original and innovative contributions I ever read on how to consider national and global political issues beyond the current dichotomy we find in contemporary literature….The book will be an indispensable tool for all those who are interested in the future of Liberal Democracy…” · Lukas K. Sosoe, University of Luxembourg
Central to discussions of multiculturalism and minority rights in modern liberal societies is the idea that the particular demands of minority groups contradict the requirements of equality, anonymity, and universality for citizenship and belonging. The contributors to this volume question the significance of this dichotomy between the universal and the particular, arguing that it reflects how the modern state has instituted the basic rights and obligations of its members and that these institutions are undergoing fundamental transformations under the pressure of globalization. They show that the social bonds uniting groups constitute the means of our freedom, rather than obstacles to achieving the universal.
Paul Dumouchel is Professor of philosophy at the Graduate School of Core Ethics and Frontier Sciences, Ritsumeikan University, Kyoto. He is the author of Le sacrifice inutile essai sur la violence politique (Paris: Flammarion, 2011) and The Ambivalence of Scarcity and Other Essays (Michigan State University Press, 2014) and co-edited with Rieko Gotoh Against Injustice the New Economics of Amartya Sen (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
Reiko Gotoh is Professor at the Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo. She is the author of Economical Philosophy of Justice: Rawls and Sen (Toyo Keizai Shinposha, 2002, in Japanese) and co-edited, with Paul Dumouchel, Against Injustice: The New Economics of Amartya Sen (Cambridge University Press, 2009) and, with Amartya Sen, Well-Being and Justice (University of Tokyo Press, 2008, in Japanese).
LC: B105.U5S64 2015
BISAC: POL003000 POLITICAL SCIENCE/Civics & Citizenship; POL010000 POLITICAL SCIENCE/History & Theory; SOC026000 SOCIAL SCIENCE/Sociology/General
BIC: JPA Political science & theory; JHBA Social theory
List of Tables
Introduction: Of Bonds and Boundaries
Paul Dumouchel & Reiko Gotoh
Part I: Social bonds in transformation
Chapter 1. Incompleteness and the Possibility of Making: Towards denationalized citizenship?
Chapter 2. Justice and Culture: New contradictions in the era of techno-nihilistic capitalism
Chapter 3. Bounded Justifiability: Making commonality on the basis of binding engagements
Chapter 4. On the Poverty of our Freedom
Part II: Beyond imperial universalism
Chapter 5. Western Humanitarianism and the Representation of Distant Suffering: A genealogy of moral grammars and visual regimes
Chapter 6. Parochial Altruism and Christian Universalism: On the deep difficulties of creating solidarity without outside enemies
Chapter 7. Partial Commitments and Universal Obligations
Chapter 8. A Reluctant Cosmopolitan
Part III: Towards a re-conceptualization of liberalism
Chapter 9. Liberal Autonomy and Minority Accommodation: A new approach
Geoffrey Brahm Levey
Chapter 10. Cultural Boundaries and the Reasonable Accommodation of Minorities: Is secularism enough?
Chapter 11. Arrow, Rawls and Sen: The Transformation of Political Economy and the Idea of Liberalism
Conclusion: Social bonds as freedom
Notes on Contributors
Back to Top